تحلیل ساختاری-کارکردی نظام‌های تقنینی تک‌مجلسی و دومجلسی؛ جهات توجیهی و نگاه انتقادی

الف: فارسی

1. باصری، بابک و علی فقیه‌حبیبی (1397)، حقوق اساسی تطبیقی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، چ دوم.
2. راسخ، محمد (1387)، حق و مصلحت، تهران: نشر نو، چ سوم، ج 1.
3. قاری سیدفاطمی، سید محمد (1390)، حقوق بشر در جهان معاصر، تهران: شهر دانش، ج 1.
4. هارت، هربرت (1390)، مفهوم قانون، ترجمه محمد راسخ، تهران: نشر نی، چ دوم.

ب: لاتین

1. Altman, David (2011), Direct democracy worldwide, Cambridge: University Press, 1^st ed.
2. Beetham, David (2006), Parliament and democracy in the 21^st century, Switzerland: Inter parliament Union. 
3. Beramendi, Virginia (2008), Direct democracy, IDEA, Sweden.
4. Bulmer, Elliot (2014), Bicameralism, Sweden: international Institute for democracy and electoral assistance, First edition.
5. Buchanan, James M, Tullock, Gorbon (1962), The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
6. Charles de Montesquieu (1748), The spirit of laws, translated by Thomas Nugent, New York: Hafner Press.
7. Congleton, D. Roger (2002), On the merits of bicameral legislatures, Center for Study of Public Choice.
8. Madison, James (1788), “Bicameralism of second chambers in Republican Legislatures: an information theory”, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University.
9. Todd, Tom (1999), Unicameral or Bicameral State Legislatures, Minnesota House of Representatives.
10. Qvortrup, Mads, (2007), “Check and balance in a unicameral parliament: the case of the Danish minority referendum”, Journal of Legislative Study, 16 Nov. 2007.

11. Robak, Kim (1997), “The Nebraska unicameral and its lasting benefits”, Nebraska law review, Vol. 76, Issue 4.

12. Rogers, James R. (1998), “Bicameral sequence: theory and statue legislature evidence”, American Journal of Political Science, 42, pp. 1025-1060.

13. Rogers, James R. (2015), “Informational Pathologies of Bicameralism”, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. April 16-April 19, 2015.

14. Weingast, R. Shepsle (1987), “The institutional foundations of committee power”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 81, pp. 85-104.

15. Weingast, R. Shepsle (2008), Why Developing Countries Prove so Resistant to the Rule of Law, Stanford University.

16. Wang, Vibeke (2005) , the accountability function of parliament in new democracies, Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Working Paper WP 2005: 2).