An Analysis of Changing the Constitution outside the Formal Constitutional Amendment Procedure

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Imam Sadiq University

2 Ph. D Student of Public Law, Imam Sadiq University

Abstract

Maintenance of the Constitution's supremacy demands its inflexibility and one of its requirement is to predict some difficult procedures for constitutional amendment so as to prevent the Constitution to be changed by personal discretion and tendencies and to preserve the strength of the political system. Hence, most of the constitutions predict a formal constitutional amendment mechanism and determine the method of its revision. But the question is to examine whether it is possible to change the Constitution in other ways other than the formal mechanisms or not; the issue in which this research seeks to answer with an analytic approach and by examination of case studies.
The findings of this research indicate that the legislative, executive and judicial officials intentionally and also as a practical necessity change the Constitution outside the formal amendment mechanisms in order to solve the dilemmas, and in some cases the Constitution is unintentionally changed because of their proceedings and in result, is infringed. In addition, referring to the self-determination right in determining the type and quality of the legal system is a pretext for total revision of the Constitution and therefore, making a new Constitution outside the aforesaid procedure.

Keywords

References

الف) فارسی
اداره‌ی کل امور فرهنگی و روابط عمومی مجلس شورای اسلامی (1364)، صورت مشروح مذاکرات مجلس بررسی نهایی قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تهران: اداره‌ی کل امور فرهنگی و روابط عمومی مجلس شورای اسلامی، چ اول، ج 3.
تیلا، پروانه (1384)، «تحلیل چارچوب نظری بازنگری در قانون اساسی»، مجله‌ی حقوق اساسی، ش 5، صص 53-80.
عمید زنجانی، عباسعلی (1385)، حقوق اساسی ایران شامل دوره‌ی باستان، دوره‌ی اسلامی، دوره‌ی مشروطه و جمهوری اسلامی ایران با اصلاحات بازنگری 1368، تهران: مؤسسه‌ی انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران، چ اول.
قاضی، ابوالفضل (1371)، قانون اساسی سیر مفهوم و منطوق از دید تطبیقی»، مجله‌ی دانشکده‌ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی (دانشگاه تهران)، ش 28، صص 29-78.
منصوریان، مصطفی و حسین خلف‌رضایی (1393)، «مکاتب و رویکردهای تفسیر قانون اساسی»، گزارش پژوهشی پژوهشکده‌ی شورای نگهبان، شماره‌ی مسلسل 13930024.
وفادار، علی (1382)، حقوق اساسی و تحولات سیاسی، تهران: وفادار، چ سوم.
ب) لاتین
Lutz, Donald S. (1994), “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment”, The American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 355-370.
Albert, Richard (2014), "Constitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude", American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 62, pp.641-686.
Albert, Richard (2011), “The Constitutional Politics of Presidential Succession”, Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 39.
Brewer-Carías, Allan R. (2010), Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment, Cambridge University Press.
Colon-Rios, Joel (2010), “The Legitimacy of the Juridical: Constituent Power, Democracy, and the Limits of Constitutional Reform”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Volume 48, Number 2, Article 1, pp. 199-245.
Dodek, Adam M. (2007), “A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 47, pp. 287-316 & p. 295. For more Fallon Jr, Richard H., The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law, USA: Cambridge University press, 2004.
Eskridge, William N. (2001), Jr and Ferejohn, John, “Super-Statutes”, Duke Law Journal, vol. 50, pp. 1215-1276.
Ginsburg, Tom and James Melton (2014), “Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all? Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty”, University of Chicago public law and legal theory working paper, no. 472, pp. 1-35.
Shogan, Colleen J. (2015), The President’s State of the Union Address: Tradition, Function, and Policy Implications, USA: Congressional Research Service.
Strauss, David A. (1996) (A) “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation”, University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 63, pp. 877-935.
Strauss, David A. (2001) (B), “The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 114, pp. 1457-1505.
Vile, John R. (2010), Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments and Amending Issues, 1789–2002, USA: ABC-CLIO, LLC, 3th edition.
ج) پایگاه­های اینترنتی
https://www.admin.ch
http://www.lamoncloa.gob.es
http://www.parliament.bg/
http://www.ohchr.org/
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 February 2016
  • Revise Date: 25 April 2016
  • Accept Date: 15 June 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics