Feasibility of Judges’ Citation to the Constitution in the Non-Implementation of Laws Contrary to It

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master's student in Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The Constitution, as the highest legal-political instrument of the country, must be immune from any kind of intervention, for which special institutions are usually formed or appointed; otherwise, the rights and freedoms of the people in the constitution will be abandoned and the existence of the constitution will be invalidated. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Guardian Council is responsible for the protection of the Constitution in the legislative phase, and all the enactments of the parliament become law after the approval of the council. The challenge that exists in this connection is whether the judges of the courts have the discretion, by insisting on the principle of the supremacy of the constitution and the need to cite to the valid law, as well as the constitutional review entity, not to implement the laws that they consider to be contrary to the constitution and refuse to implement them?; this research aims to analyze and respond to this issue using a descriptive-analytical approach. The findings show that although it is not possible to comment on the absolute rejection or acceptance of the judges' competence in this regard, in relation to the laws passed before the formation of the Guardian Council (both pre-revolutionary laws and laws approved by the Revolutionary Council) and the enactments that became law due to ending the legal deadline for the council’s comments, and also some enforceable legal norms that are not under the review of the Guardian Council, the courts can be given the authority not to implement them.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Books
Ghamami, M., Mansoorian, M. (2018). Concepts, foundations and patterns of basic proceedings, comparative basic proceedings, the study of the basics, structures and competencies of the basic proceedings. second edition. Tehran: Guardian Research Institute. (in Persian)
Safai, H., Emami, A. (2016). Summary of family law. 48th edition, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Ghazi, A. (2013). Basic rights requirements. 49th edition, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Guardian Council Research Institute. (1400). Outline of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran: Guardian Council Research Institute. (in Persian)
Harisinejad, K. (1386). Comparative fundamental rights. Tabriz: Aydin. (in Persian)
Hashemi, M. (2016). Fundamental Rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Volume II, 27th edition, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Judge, A. (1400). Fundamental rights and political institutions, 16th edition, Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Katouzian, N. (2015). Introduction to the science of law and study in Iran's legal system. edition 104, Tehran: Publication. (in Persian)
Katouzian, N. (2018). Philosophy of Law, volume 2. first edition, Tehran: Ganj Danesh. (in Persian)
Special, M. (1390). Theoretical foundations and structure of the legal state. second edition, Tehran: Jangal Javadane. (in Persian)
Tabatabai Motmani, M. (2013). Administrative law. 19th edition, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
Articles
Alam Elhadi, H. Mehrpour, H.  (2016). Analyzing the Possibility of Reference to the Constitution by Administrative Justice Court. A Quarterly Journal of Strategy: 26(83), 215-234. 
Dadfar, H. (1332).  The Judge and the Problem of the Conflict between the Ordinary Law and the Constitutional Law. Bar Association Journal: 1 (32), 36-39. (in Persian)
Khodabakhshi Shalmazari, A. Abedinzadeh Shahri, N.  (1383). Judicial control of ordinary law in comparison with the constitution (Comparative Law and Iran), Journal of Legal Research: 3 (6), 33-60. (in Persian)
Laurent Pash. (1385).  The rule of law in France, Malmiri Center, A.  Majlis and Strategy: 13 (51), 211-258.
Mazhari, M. Marandi, S. (2017). Survey on the legal effects of competence in public law and capacity in private law. Civil Law Knowledge: 7(1) 111-99.
Taghizadeh, J. Najabatkhah, M. Fedai, R. (2015).  Preservation of Constitution by Judges of Courts with Emphasis on Article 170 of the Constitution: Academic Journal of Legal Studies Shiraz University, 8 (1), 1-28.
Taghizadeh, J. Najabatkhah, M. Qolizadeh, A. (2014). Question of Constitutional Review of Judges of Courts on the Ordinary Laws. Strategy Quarterly: 24 (76), 125-144.
Tila, P. (1384).  The sovereignty of the constitution and the duties of judges in the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Legal Research: 4(7), 159-181. (in Persian)
Documents
Amendment to the Constitutional Constitution (1906).
Approved Criminal Procedure Law (2013).
Approved Islamic Penal Code (2012).
Public and International Law Research Institute. (2012). Judiciary Research Institute, specialized meeting on the ability of ordinary courts to refer to the Constitution of the Constitutional Rights Group.
The approved government punishment law (1988).
The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran approved (1979) and reforms (1989).

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 29 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 13 November 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics