The Legal Feasibility of Crowdsourcing For the Revision & Codification of The Rules & Regulations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty member, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Student of Islamic Studies & Public Law, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The high volume of laws and regulations and their dispersion has become a problem in our legal system for many years. Citizens, lawyers, and even decision-makers have faced many laws and regulations, not only that the relationship between them is unclear, but sometimes they are unaware that some are obsoleted. The issue of organizing these laws and regulations, entitled “Revision” for several years, has been on the agenda of the three powers, especially the legislature and the executive power. The development of communication and information technologies and the possibility of using collective wisdom and successful global experiences in this regard, has made the use of this method of depuration as a suggestion that can be considered. But the key question is whether, basically in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is it possible to use this method to revise the laws and regulations? Focusing on various dimensions and stages of revision, collective wisdom can play an important role in identifying and proposing its proper organization, but the legislation of this organization in law and regulation, according to the constitution, not only cannot be delegated out of the structure of legislative references but cannot even obligate legislator to follow the result of collective wisdom.

Keywords

References

  1. Javadi Khosraghi, Hanieh (2013), Identification of Factors Affecting Collectors' Performance on Demolition Platforms, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi University of Technology, Tehran.
  2. Rezaei, Maryam (2016), Mechanism design approach to solve a crowdfunding problem. Faculty of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran.
  3. Aghaei Toogh, Moslem (2017), "A conceptual look at the formulation of laws and its distinction pp. Revision", Public Law Studies, Volume 47, Number 1, pp. 97-111.
  4. Aghaei Toogh, Moslem (2019), "Formal compilation; The missing link in the system of drafting and revising laws and regulations in Iran ", Law of Justice, Volume 83, Number 106, pp. 1-19.
  5. Ansari, Baqer (2012), "Comparative study of revision and codification of laws and regulations (codification)", Legal Research, No. 54, pp. 91-156.
  6. Parvin, Khairullah; Faramarzi, Reza; Pashaei Amiri, Reza (2021), "Revision of laws and regulations, a step in guaranteeing the principle of legal security", Public Law Knowledge, Volume 9, Number 30, pp. 95-116.
  7. Taghizadeh, Javad; Najabatkhah, Morteza; Fooladvand, Sajjad (2014), "Reflections on the delegation of legislative authority in the views of the Guardian Council", Knowledge of Public Law, Volume 3, Number 7, pp. 1-26.
  8. Darvishvand, Abolfazl; Fazaeli, Ahmad; Ismaili Givi, Hamid Reza (2018), A Study of the Status of the Decisions of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution in the Opinions of the Guardian Council ", Knowledge of Public Law, Volume 7, Number 21, pp. 21-50.
  9. Sharif, Mohammad (2005), "Legal status of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and the level of its approvals", Law and Politics Research, Nos. 15 and 16, pp. 213-248.
  10. Shafiee, Hamidreza (2008), "Reflections on the revision and codification of laws and regulations in Iran; Past, Present and Future ”, Legal Information Quarterly, New Volume, No. 11, pp. 123-140.
  11. Farahani, Mohammad Sadegh; Bahadori Jahromi, Ali (2018), "Revision of laws; Biology of Concept, Background and Fundamentals ", Thoughts on Public Law, Volume 8, Number 14, pp. 75-88.
  12. Katozian, Nasser (2007), "Revision of Laws and Regulations (Interview)", Quarterly Journal of Legal Information, New Volume, No. 11, pp. 167-181.
  13. Kadkhodai, Abbas Ali; Mr. Toogh, Muslim (2012), "Explaining the concept of the principle of non-delegation of legislation in the light of the principle of constitutional supremacy; A Critique of the Guardian Council Procedure, Public Law Research, Volume 14, Number 38, pp. 77-100.
  14. Malek Afzali, Mohsen (2008), "Status and validity of the resolutions of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution", Islamic Government, Volume 13, Number 48, pp. 144-174.
  15. Mir Mohammadi Meybodi, Mostafa va Elham, Gholam Hossein (2013), "Study of the interference of the resolutions of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution with the resolutions of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, the government and the Expediency Council", Journal of Islamic Law, Volume 14, Number 37, pp. 155-179.
  16. Interview with Dr. Rahpik (Legal Member of the Guardian Council), Familiarity with the position and competencies of the Guardian Council, Guardian Council Research Institute, Report No. 13930188, 12/17/2014
  17. Banai Oskooi, Majid (2015), "Restriction of the jurisdiction of the Court of Administrative Justice by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution", Public Law Studies, Volume 45, Number 4, pp. 631-665.
  18. Nouraei, Mehdi, "Legislative Authorities in the Constitutional Law System of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Office of Law and Legislation Studies, Guardian Council Research Institute, serial number 13920031, 12/06/2013.
  19. Hedayatnia Ganji, Farajullah (2002), "Legal status of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and its approvals", Ravagh Andisheh, No. 8, pp. 53-70.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 January 2021
  • Revise Date: 29 May 2021
  • Accept Date: 07 September 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics