Investigating the Conflict of Interests of Judicial Officials

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Ph. D in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Conflict of interests is directly related to corruption, conflict of interests creates the fear that one's personal interests will be preferred to the interests that are responsible for supporting them, and therefore is one of the opportunities for corruption. One of the most important areas of conflict management is the conflict of interests of the judicial officials; because the sensitivity of the judicial Officials and its relationship to public rights requires special rules in conflict management to prevent mistrust of this post. Therefore, the important question of this research is: what are the strategies for managing the conflict of interests of judicial officials? In Iran’s legal system, there are several ways to manage the conflicts of interests of these officials; In some areas, such as the ban on simultaneous employment and the ban on receiving gifts, our country's legislative approach is considered desirable; However, in other areas, such as the asset declaration system, the ban on litigation, the ban on Revolving Door, and the ban regarding political activities, conflict resolution management strategies are often incomplete, and it is necessary for the legislature to address the shortcomings in this area in order to limit the grounds for corruption by the judicial officials.

Keywords


  1. A: Persian

    1. Akbari Rudpashti, Azim, Zamani, Seyed Ghasem (2019), "Judicial Decency in the Iranian Legal System", Journal of Islamic Law, Vol. 59.
    2. Ansari, Mehdi, Rahmani, Mohammad Hossein, Rouhani, Seyed Ali (2016), A Review of the World Literature of the "Revolving Door " Phenomenon (Movement of Persons between the Private and Public Sector): Motivations, Consequences and Strategies of Regulation, Tehran: Office of Economic Studies Deputy of Economic Research, Parliamentary Research Center.
    3. Pashaei, Hossein, Motamedi, Javad (2019), "Reforming Judicial Processes in the Light of the Strategy for Resolving Conflict of Interests", Quarterly Journal of Private Law, Vol. 34.
    4. Abstinence, Seyed Abbas, Abolfazl Razzaqi (2017), Conflict of Interests: Prevention and Management Strategies, Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
    5. Derakhshan, Davar (2015), Prevention and Management of Conflict of Interests in the Judiciary: A Case Study of the United States, the United Kingdom and Iran, Tehran: Center for Strategic Studies and Judicial Transformation Management.
    6. Zeinaloo, Mehdi, Ali Ahmadi, Alireza, Nariman, Saeed (2019), "Study of the Causes of Conflict of Interest in the Members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly", Public Policy Quarterly, Vol. 2.
    7. Khaleghi, Ali (2014), Notes on the Code of Criminal Rules of Procedure, Tehran: Shahr-e Danesh.8.
    8. Sakuchi, Andrea (2007), "Independence and Impartiality of Judges, a Fundamental Condition of Fair Trial", Judiciary Monthly, vol. 47.
    9. Shams, Abdullah (2005), Civil Rules of Procedure Code, Tehran: Drak Publications, Vol. 3.
    10. Ghamami, Majid, Mohseni, Hassan (2006), "Principles Guaranteeing Democratic Performance in the Judiciary and Principles related to the Characteristics of Civil Proceedings", Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol. 74.
    11. Ghamami, Majid, Mohseni, Hasan (2011), Transnational Civil Rules of Procedure, Tehran: Anteshar Co.
    12. Qanad, Fatemeh (2009), "Bangalore Principles on Judicial Conduct, approved in 2002", Quarterly Journal of Jurisprudence and Law, Vol. 5.
    13. Moin, Mohammad (1984), Persian Dictionary, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications, Vol. 1.
    14. Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Hossein (2001), Crimes against Public Security and Comfort, Tehran: Mizan.
    15. Vakilian, Hassan, Derakhshan, Davar (2017), "Study of the Effectiveness of Property Disclosure Laws in Reducing Corruption with a Comparative Approach", Judicial Law Perspectives, pp. 77-78.
    16. Vakilian, Hassan, Derakhshan, Davar (2020), "Strategies for Prevention and Management of Conflict of Interest in the Judicial System with a Comparative Approach", Justice Quarterly, Vol. 109.

    B: Latin

    1. Abate, Frank R (1999), The Oxford American Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press.
    2. Abramson, Leslie W. (1993), Specifying Grounds for Judicial Disqualification in Federal Courts, Nebraska Law Review, vol. 72, no. 4.
    3. American Law Institute (2005), Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure, Cambridge University Press.
    4. Bainbridge, Stephen M. (2013), Research Handbook on Insider Trading, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.
    5. Canadian Judicial Council (2004), ethical principles for judges, Ottawa, Ontario, 2004.
    6. Council of Europe (2015), European judicial systems: Efficiency and quality of justice, Council of Europe.
    7. Council of Europe (1997), Les acteurs du procès: avec une référence particulière au procès penal, Council of Europe.
    8. Davids, Cindy (2008), Conflict of Interest in Policing: Problems, Practices, and Principles, Institute of Criminology.
    9. Federal Judicial Center (2013), Maintaining the Public Trust: Ethics for Federal Judicial Law Clerks, Fourth Edition, Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Codes of Conduct, January 1.
    10. Ganahl, Joseph Patrick (2014), Corruption, Good Governance, and the African State: A Critical Analysis of the Political-Economic Foundations of Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa, Vol. 2, Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
    11. Hartley, Roger E. (2014), 'It’s Called Lunch': Judicial Ethics and the Political and Legal Space for the Judiciary to 'Lobby' (May 9, 2014), Arizona Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 1.
    12. Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice (2009), Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, National Academies Press.
    13. Judicial Conference Regulations on Gifts (2017), Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 2, Pt. C., Ch. 6.
    14. Keubou, Philippe (2010), Précis de procédure pénale camerounaise, Presses univresitaires d'Afrique.
    15. Labbée, Xavier (2006), Introduction générale au droit: pour une approche éthique, Presses Univ. Septentrion.
    16. Langseth. Petter (2002), Judicial Integrity and its Capacity to Enhance the Public Interest, Search Results Web results global programme against corruption conferences, Vienna.
    17. Morris, Stephen D. (1991), Corruption & politics in contemporary Mexico, University of Alabama Press.
    18. Neubauer, David W. (2016), Meinhold, Stephen S., Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Politics in the United States, Cengage Learning.
    19. OECD (2005), Conflict of Interest Policies and Practices in Nine EU Member States: A Comparative Review, SIGMA Papers, No. 36, OECD Publishing, Paris.
    20. OECD (2020), Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020, OECD Publishing.
    21. OECD (2010), Post-Public Employment Good Practices for Preventing Conflict of Interest: Good Practices for Preventing Conflict of Interest, OECD Publishing.
    22. Office of Democracy and Governance (2002), Guidance for Promoting Judicial Independence and Impartiality, Technical Publication Series, Office of Democracy and Governance, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523-3100.
    23. StachowiczStanusch, Agata (2010), Organizational Immunity to Corruption: Building Theoretical and Research Foundations, IAP.
    24. Tarkington, Margaret (2018), Voice of Justice: Reclaiming the First Amendment Rights of Lawyers, Cambridge University Press.
    25. TAIEX seminar (2015), Conflict of Interest in the Judiciary, EU Delegation in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    26. World Bank (2013), Income and Asset Disclosure: Case Study, World Bank Publications.