Bingham, T. (2008). A Personal Perspective. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I31-I32.
Brennan Jr., William J. (2008). In Defense of Dissents. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-46-I-51.
Bricker, B. (2017). Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts. Law & Policy, 39, 170-191.
Commission Européenne pour la Démocratie par le Droit (2018). Rapport sur les Opinions Séparées dans les Cours Constitutionnelles. Strasbourg (Avis n° 932/2018 CDL-AD(2018)030rev).
Elster, J. (2015). Introduction. In Jon Elster (Ed.): Secrecy and publicity in votes and debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–14.
Fraisse, R. (2005). «Intervention du responsable du service juridique du Conseil constitutionnel français». In La contribution des services juridiques à la prise de décision des cours constitutionnelles. Conférence des secrétaires généraux des cours constitutionnelles européennes tenue à Bled. Slovénie.
Freixes, T. (2000). La pratique des opinions dissidentes en Espagne. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Garlicki, L. (2008). Note on Dissent in the European Court of Human Rights. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-8-I-10.
Giménez, F. (2017). Changing the Channel: Broadcasting Deliberations in the Mexican Supreme Court. In R. Davis & D. Taras (Eds.). Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective (209-234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, R. (2010). The Role of Dissenting Opinions. Minnesota Law Review, 95, 1-8.
Ginsburg, T., & Garoupa, N. (2011). Building Reputation in Constitutional Courts: Political and Judicial Audiences. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 539-568.
Gorlani, M. (2008). The Dissenting Opinion in the Jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court: A Model Importable to Italy? Global Constitutionalism, Yale Law School. I-27-I-30.
Grimm, D. (2008). Some Remarks on the Use of Dissenting Opinions in Continental Europe (Based on My German Experience). In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-I-I-5.
Human Rights Committee (2011). General Comment No.34. Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression. CCPR/C/GC/34.
Kelemen, K. (2013). Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Courts. Ger. law j. 14(8), 1345–1371.
Kirby, M. D. (2008). Judicial Dissent—Common Law and Civil Law Tradition. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-32-I-I-36.
Laffranque, J. (2003). Dissenting Opinion and Judicial Independence. JI, VIII, 162–172.
Lasser, M. (2004). Judicial deliberations. A comparative analysis of transparency and legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lécuyer, Y. (2004). Le secret du délibéré, les opinions séparées et la transparence. RevTrimDrH, 57, 197-223.
L'Heureux-Dubé, C. (2000{a}). The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future. Osgoode Hall L. J., 38, 495-517.
L'Heureux-Dubé. C. (2000{b}). La pratique des opinions dissidentes au Canada- L'opinion dissidente: voix de l'avenir?. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Luchaire, F. (2000). La transposition des opinions dissidentes en France est-elle souhaitable? «Contre»: Le point de vue de deux anciens membres du Conseil constitutionnel. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Macfarlane, E. (2010). Consensus and Unanimity at the Supreme Court of Canada, 52 Supreme Court Law Review, (2d), 379-410.
Mels, P. (2008). Disclosure of Separate Opinions and Voting Results. Translated by Tollund. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-13-I-17.
Miller, A, & Sastri, D. (1973). Secrecy and the Supreme Court: On the Need for Piercing the Red Velour Curtain. Buffalo Law Review, 22(3), 799-823.
O'Connor, S. D. (2003). William Howard Taft and the Importance of Unanimity. J Supreme Court History, 28(2), 157–164.
Pasquino, P. (2015). E pluribus unum: Disclosed and Undisclosed Votes in Constitutional/Supreme Courts. In Jon Elster (Ed.): Secrecy and publicity in votes and debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 196–208.
Post, R. (2008). The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent. Legal Scholarship and Decision-making in the Taft Court. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-54-I-51.
Pound, R. (2008). Cacoethes Dissentiendi: The Heated Judicial Dissent. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-51-I-54.
Raffaelli, R. (2012). Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member States, European Parliament.
Roellecke, G. (2008). Sondervotum [Separate Opinions], Translated by Tollund, Inc. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-17-I-26.
Rousseau, D. (2000). La transposition des opinions dissidentes en France est-elle souhaitable? «Pour»: Une opinion dissidente en faveur des opinions dissidents. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Rousseau, D., & Gahdoun, P., & Bonnet, J. (2016): Droit du contentieux constitutionnel. Paris: LGDJ-Lextenso éditions (Domat droit public).
Scalia, A. (2008). The Dissenting Opinion. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I-42-I-46.
Schermers, H. G., & Waelbroeck, D. F. (2008). Dissenting Opinions. In Global Constitutionalism. Yale Law School, I.5-I.7.
Slotnick, E. E. (1999). Judicial Politics: Readings from Judicature. United States: American Judicature Society.
Swiss Federal Supreme Court, General Secretariat (2017). The Swiss Federal Supreme Court, The Third Power within the Federal State.
Trocsanyi, L., & Horvath, A. (2000). La pratique des opinions dissidentes en Hongrie- Les opinions individuelles en Hongrie: une institution. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Vedel, G. (2000). La transposition des opinions dissidentes en France est-elle souhaitable? «Contre»: Le point de vue de deux anciens membres du Conseil constitutionnel. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Walter, C. (2000). La pratique des opinions dissidentes en Allemagne. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
Wittig, C. (2016). The Occurrence of Separate Opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court. An Analysis with a Novel Database. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin.
Zagrebelsky, G. (2000). La pratique des opinions dissidentes en Italie. Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, N°8.
)